Read the poster, hear the announcement: two new exercise types
One passage for three questions, why the settings are apartment lobbies and supermarkets instead of meeting rooms, how to use them so they work, and where they fall short of the real test.
The TOEIC most learners picture is an office: a meeting moved, a quote, an email from a manager. Open the Reading (Part 7) exercise in Lingua and you get a lease renewal notice taped up in an apartment lobby. Open Announcements (Part 4) and you hear a supermarket loudspeaker. It looks like the wrong subject. It is not, and the middle of this post says why.
First, what these two exercises are.
One passage, three questions
Lingua already had two things that sit close to this, so it is easy to think they overlap.
There is listening practice (Part 2): you hear one line and pick the reply. Each line is its own little exercise, done when answered, and the next one has nothing to do with the last. And there are everyday passages: a short text built from the words you just learned, read straight through, with no questions at all.
The two new types differ in two ways. One passage serves three questions, and you get a score.
That sounds small and it changes the whole job. The three questions in a set are pulled from three different places in the same notice: one asks what the notice is for, one asks about a detail stated outright, and one makes you join two lines far apart before an answer appears. A vague understanding is enough for one question. It is not enough for all three.
A score means that at the end of a round you see a number like 3/3, and the coins you earned. That number is not for showing off. It is there so you know whether you understood or guessed.
How to get in: the word list page for every topic has two buttons, Đọc hiểu (Part 7) and Nghe thông báo (Part 4), and the topic cards on the Journey page have icons that go straight there. There are 40 sets across the 10 topics of stages 1 to 10: four per topic, two to read, two to hear.
Why apartment lobbies and supermarkets, not meeting rooms
Because that is where you actually meet English.
Count back to the last time you sat in a meeting held in English. For most people learning, the answer is never. But a gate change over an airport speaker, a note taped to a hotel reception desk, a card saying a parcel is waiting, the guarantee slip for a rice cooker, the rules pinned up in a shared laundry room: you meet all of these on your first trip abroad, and you meet them while you are trying to get something done.
The vocabulary is still TOEIC vocabulary, not one word less. The method is bridging: take the
topic's working words and put them in an everyday setting. renew, agreement, party and
provision belong to the contracts topic, and they sit inside a lease renewal notice on a lobby
wall. The words do not change. Only where they stand changes.
The second benefit is quieter: a familiar setting gives your head somewhere to put a new word. You already know what a building notice says, when the deadline is, where to hand the form in, what happens if you are late. So when a strange word turns up in it, you still have a frame to guess from. Meeting a strange word in the middle of a meeting about something you do not follow is two hard things stacked on each other, and you usually lose both.
How to use them so they work
Part 7: read the questions first, then scan the notice.
The natural reflex is to read the whole notice top to bottom, understand all of it, and only then look at the questions. That is the slowest way. Read the questions first and you know what you are hunting for, and the job turns into scanning rather than reading. A purpose question means look at the heading and the first paragraph. A detail question means hunt for a number, a date, a name. A "Look at the table" question means go straight to the table and skip the text above it.
The notice stays on screen through all three questions, so you can go back as often as you like. There is no reason to try to memorise it.
And do not trust the feeling that an option sounds familiar. The wrong options here are built from words that really are in the notice, taking a genuine detail and using it to answer the wrong question. An option that reads as familiar is not evidence that it is right, only evidence that you skimmed those words somewhere. Go back and find the actual line.
Part 4: listen right through once for the gist, then hit replay.
The talk plays by itself when you enter a set. On that first pass, do not try to catch every word. Come away with three things: where the speaker is, who they are talking to, and what they want the listener to do. Those three are usually enough for the setting question and the next-action question, which is two of the three. Only then press the round button to replay and pick up the detail you are missing.
Hitting replay ten seconds in, before you have any sense of the whole, means replaying something you still have no frame to understand. The second pass gives you exactly what the first one did.
The table is where your EYES work while your EARS listen.
Some talks come with a table on screen. Read that table first, read it while you wait for the talk
to start. The table never holds the whole answer on its own, and neither does the talk: the talk
gives you one column, the table maps it to the other. In one set a building announcement says this
week's session is about lease renewal terms, and only the table says that topic falls on Wednesday
evening. Listening alone gives you a topic. Looking alone gives you four evenings. Only joining them
gives you one evening.
So while the talk is running, your eyes should be on the table, looking for the name you just heard.
Where these fall short of the real test
Said plainly rather than hidden, because you will notice it in the first five minutes anyway.
The voice is a machine. The talk is read by your browser, not recorded by a person. It is flat: no stress on the important word, no hesitation, no rise at the end of a question. And a real speaker's intonation is half the information in Part 4. It is exactly because the machine voice is flat that these talks have to be written in short sentences with a single speaker: a long multi-clause sentence read by a machine is simply not followable. The price: you are training the skill of catching information, not yet the skill of staying with a real person speaking fast.
You can replay as much as you like, and the real test does not let you. In the exam room the talk runs once and that is that, and part of what makes Part 4 hard lives right there. Here that round button takes as many presses as you want. Using it to work out a spot you missed is good. Using it instead of practising the single pass means you are training on an easier exercise than the real one, and you find out on test day. If a test is coming, set your own rule: first pass, then answer all three, and only after scoring do you replay to see where you went wrong.
The talk never appears as text, not even after you answer. This differs from Part 2 listening, where the line you heard shows up once you have chosen. The reason is that three questions share one talk: showing the words after question 1 hands over the answers to the other two. The cost you carry is that when you simply cannot hear it, there is no transcript to check against. That is the price of sharing one passage.
And there are not many of them yet. Forty sets, four per topic. A whole topic takes a few minutes. This is somewhere to practise a skill, not yet somewhere to grind.
What to measure
Do not measure by sets finished. Forty sets is one evening, and finishing them that way brings nothing home.
Measure by the questions you got wrong. Getting one wrong because you did not know a word is the light case, one lookup and it is over. Getting one wrong because you read the words correctly and took the wrong meaning is the case worth stopping for: go back to the notice, find the exact line that should have answered it, and look at how you walked past it.
One wrong answer taken apart properly teaches you more than ten right ones you guessed.